Arny Krueger wrote:
ScottW wrote:
wrote:
Except for amplifiers and CD or DVD players this training
isn't worth
the disk space it occupies.
Scott, this just shows how much you've missed about the
PCABX web site.
Answer these questions if you can, Scott:
(1) What kind of product tests are demonstrated at the PCABX
web site, IOW which kinds of products are demonstrated?
amps, soundcards, coders&decoders & minidisc
(2) Are there any tests of DVD players at the PCABX web
site? If not, where do you get off mentioning them in
relation to it?
Sorry... thanks for pointing out the PCABX is useless for the vast
majority of audio equipment sources in use today.
Further PCABX training is flawed due to uncontrolled
reproduction variables.
Name those variables and state how they are totally
uncontrolled.
Why don't you tell me how you are controlling the noise level of my PC
at work. It sucks BTW.
As comparison... when you made ABX boxes... didn't you try to make
sure they didn't have an audible influsion on the signal they switched?
Production of "severe listenrs" is not a goal, btw.
As far as who is concerned?
What do you think sever listeners will accomplish? Whatever that
is.. is the goal. Production of severe listeners who do nothing seems
pretty silly to me.
Like selling street racers in a country without roads.
Such is genius of PCABX.
ScottW