"Eiron" wrote in message
...
Trevor Wilson wrote:

I note that in another thread, Howard Ferstler has referred to me as a
"pompous windbag". Whilst this may (possibly) be true, does anyone else
see this as a 'pot, kettle, black' kind of thing?

I stress that he actually had the temerity to call me a pompous windbag,
whilst attempting to tell me that I was incorrect in the field of circuit
analysis. A risky thing for Mr Ferstler to do, considering I did,
actually spend quite some time studying the topic at college. I would be
interested in knowing Mr Ferstler's qualifications as they pertain to
circuit analysis. Am I correct in assuming that he has no idea about the
topic?


It could be construed as pompous to quote your qualifications in support
of an argument.

**I suppose. It seemed necessary, because Mr Ferstler seemed intent on
ignoring circuit theory. I take your point, however.


As for spending 'quite some time' studying circuit analysis,
I recall that some pupils never quite grasped the concept of Ohm's law.

**Then they would not really be students. They would be something else.
Ohm's Law is pretty basic stuff in the scheme of circuit analysis.


--
Trevor Wilson
www.rageaudio.com.au