AudioBanter.com - View Single Post

Arny Krueger wrote:
wrote:

John Atkinson wrote:

Schizoid Man wrote:

Stereophile has also done no favors to the audio
enthusiast/audiophile community by reviewing products
such as the Tice Clock.

Given the depth of your ire, it would seem almost
churlish
to point that Stereophile's coverage of the Tice Clock
was
thought so negative by the manufacturer that they
canceled
all their advertising in my magazine. But I guess that
doesn't
make such a good story, does it.

It makes the story more interesting, or at least more
confusing.

Even the most crack-crazed whore has things she won't do.

So, I'm told. But then RAO has the Middius clique, doesn't
it?

In your case, you drew the line at giving a positive
review to a blatantly
fraudulent "device" marketed by cold-blooded cynics.

That strikes me as a pretty good description of the Tice
Clock.

Congratulations.

We thus might have some measure of the depths that SP won't
go down to.

There are still positive reviews of Shakti Stones, Mpingo
Discs,
"cable cookers" and other assorted BS to answer for,
Atkinson.

How do you distinguish these from the Tice clock?

a) The Tice Clock is such a transparent hoax that even the sponge-brain
writers at the Pile could see through it.

b) Atkinson needed a sacrifical lamb to establish some credibility and
the Tice Clock was an easy target.

c) Tice didn't buy enough ad space

d) All of the above

OR?????

I like "d". ;-)