MINe 109 wrote:

In article ,
"Arny Krueger" wrote:


The experience itself paints a pretty nasty picture of
Atkinson. It has acceptance of weak proof painted all
over
it.

Or a "road to Damascas" moment akin to the one that led to
Stereophile
to begin with.

Why don't you tell us about that "Road To Damascas" moment
that led to the creation of Stereophile to begin with.

He cunningly anticipated the debate by publishing the
story in 1989.

http://www.stereophile.com/features/113/

...only about 9 years after it happened and during one of
the first big consumer-level pushes for ABX.

Who cares how long it took?

Clearly, nobody who has suspended disbelief in Sterephile's
weirdness...

JGH and Stereophile were open to ABX and
more-or-less accepted its premises at face value.

Good job of obfuscating the point that Atkinson who is
Sterephile's editor, was not open to ABX and only compares
it to a bogus standard.

Do you harbor a grudge, blaming Stereophile for somehow
preventing
mass consumer acceptance of an ABX product?

Given the consumer acceptance of PCABX, why would I care?

Stephen