dave weil wrote:

On Fri, 27 May 2005 16:39:02 -0400, Howard Ferstler
wrote:

I rarely use the synthesizers, for reasons that I have
explained elsewhere. As for the Hsu (and SVS) subs being
cheap, I have compared them pretty closely to both of my
servo Velodyne models and they hold up very well with test
tones and are functionally equal with musical and movie
material.

Then no need to buy the "overpriced" Velodyne.

I hope that you made that point during reviews.

Go read them and see what you think. The F1800RII and FSR-12
reviews appeared in issue 67 of TSS, right along with the
review of the Hsu TN1220. A review of the Velodyne servo
HGS-15 appeared in volume 6, issue 4 of The Audiophile Voice
and a review of the the company's HGS-12 appeared in issue
80 of TSS. Reviews of the Hsu VTF-3 appeared in volume 8,
issue 4 of TAV, a review of the VTF-2 appeared in issue 88
of TSS, and a review of the Hsu STF-1 appeared in issue 100.
A reviews of the SVS 16-46 appeared in issue 88, a review of
the SVS 25-31 appeared in issue 94, and the company's PC
Ultra system appeared in issue 102. For the record, a review
of Paradigm's Servo 15 sub appeared in issue 71 of TSS, a
review of the NHT Evolution sub pair appeared volume 8,
issue 5 of TAV, a review of the Waveform MC sub pair
appeared in issue 84 of TSS, and a review of a B&W Subwoofer
2000 appeared in issue 73.

Those are some of the subs I have reviewed here and there
(there are others, but they are inconsequential in this
case), so all you have to do is read the reports and see
what I say about Velodyne performance in comparison to the
competition. I often compare and mention various points.

Howard Ferstler