Robert Morein wrote:
wrote in message

ups.com...
George M. Middius schrieb:
Robert Morein said to ****-for-Brains:

You are simply too combative, too vociferous, to be a
good
scientist. If you were repudiated in a way that
resulted in
widespread, definitive rejection of what you think is
true, it
would be a major blow to your ego. Your ego is too
wrapped up in
this.

Can we dispense, once and for all, with the fiction that
Arnii
Krooger has some connection to human-style science? He's
a
religious zealot, pure and simple. He has co-opted a few
notions
and phrases from the world of science, then twisted and
malformed
them to suit his narrow agenda. Look at his
pseudo-scientific
claims about amplifiers sounding the same. It's all
based on a few
shreds of data, unsubstantiated by any rigorous
investigation. It
boils down to nothing more than "At some point, some
individuals
were unable to distinguish some amps under some
conditions."
Calling that science is like calling a pancake that
resembles an
image of "Virgin Mary" a miracle.

If you compare Krooger's scieenecncce **** with real
science, you
have to laugh. Compare it with the so-called
"intelligent design"
dogma, and you get a lot of parallels.


What is it for you? What make you think that all these
middle aged
guys, who like to play with their toys, would benefit
in any
meaningful way from your work? Has it ever occurred to
you that if
you actually did convince them there was no magic, that
their
lives might be worse?

This notion is totally lost on the Krooborg. His mental
illness is
so entrenched that he doesn't even recognize the concept
of
enjoying life. Haven't you heard The Tape?


What is this "The Tape"?

It's the real Arny Krueger, not the sanitized version he
managed to
contrive for Stereophile.

Actually, the inverse is true. The Stereophile debate
exposed the real me, not the falsified version that Atkinson
and his minions including Middius tried to contrive. I'm not
involving Atkinson gratuitously here. He said here that
wanted to be involved in the production and dissemination of
the contents of "the tape". There's no independent
verifiable evidence that "the tape" actually existed prior
to the debate, and no more evidence since.