AudioBanter.com - View Single Post

wrote:
"Arny Krueger" wrote in message
...

"Robert Morein" wrote
in
message ...

"Arny Krueger" wrote in message
news
"Robert Morein" wrote in message
...

"Arny Krueger" wrote in message
...

"EddieM" wrote in message
. ..

What is really wrong with sighted evaluation ?

Nothing, depending on the situation.

The problem with sighted listening is that when the
differences are small, it can be very unreliable.

Taken by itself, that's a very reasonable statement.
The apparent disagreement is that you believe that far
more components fall
into the class of "small differences" than I do.
"Jenn" agrees with me that,
depending upon the individual, this class varies.

That's easy to resolve. No harm is done if you treat a
larger difference like it was a smaller difference. The
worst that can happen is that the small
difference-oriented
test gives an outstandingly strong positive result for
differences.

The harm comes when, in response to my statement that I
despise the sound of
QSC amps, which is actually my specific position with
respect to those amps,
you attempt to disqualify my comment from consideration.

Not really, "Arny is a bad Scientist" Robert. Your
statement
disqualifies itself. Obviously, it is based on your
hatred
and pent-up desire to attack me and try to destroy my
credibility any way you can.

Exactly my point. Morein is a bad scientist, so he accuses
you of
being one. Touche!
He's a lot like those scammers on rec.audio.marketplace
that
"OFFICIAL RAM" kicked off usenet.
Intellectual RIPOFF ALERT!

Agreed. Robert seems to be well-practiced at
externalization.