wrote in message
oups.com...
Margaret von B. schrieb:
wrote in message
ups.com...
Robert Morein schrieb:
wrote in message
...
Greetings,

Interested in opinions on these three amplifiers, which I am
considering to power original Von Schweikert VR-4's......

I need to tighten up the bottom end and get more "punch" out of the
midbass on these VR-4's.......

The Hafler shines on the spec sheet, with a superfast slew rate and
incredibly high damping factor, but I don't buy on spec's alone....

The Aragon, despite the Bryston's rating of 300/wpc, seems to be the
"brute" of the bunch, with a massive, dual power supply and huge
filter capacitance. I would imagine the 200/wpc spec is very
conservatively rated. The heaviest amplifier of the bunch, if that
means anything....

The Bryston seems to get rave reviews, but I'm concerned about its
reportedly "laid back" presentation. The VR-4's are slightly "dark"
to begin with, and I need something to bring them to life.....

Any input would be greatly appreciated......

Thanks!!

I've heard older Brystons, and been unimpressed. They sound too much
like
QSC sound reinforcement amps -- dull, uninvolving, and lacking detail.
The Aragon MKII is quite a good amp. The original MKI was a low bias,
Class
AB amp with a grainy sound.
Those familiar with this group know that I like Hafler amps. However,
the
9505 is probably not the best match for the VR4. I would recommend
the
Aragon for this speaker.


I am questioning this. Is what you write the real sound of these
amplifiers, or the way they are imagined to sound? What would cause
"lacking detail"? Other than high noise level? Do these sound
differences be less or even go away if you do not know the amplifier
you are listening to?


They be sound different. Difference do be significant. Are you do be
speak
england?

Margaret



I think they sound more the same when less is imagined. Try for
yourself.

England? Do you mean English? My English is not so good. I am trying to
be better with English.


I deal with non-native speakers of english all the time and am very familiar
with their grammatical errors. No problems there, ever. Your english just
happens to be mangled up on purpose. Just like the english of another phony
poster on this board. Nice try but no cigar.

Margaret