George M. Middius wrote:

John Atkinson said:


If you are suing someone for defamatory remarks posted to
Usenet, then why on earth do you continue to engage the
target of your lawsuit in conversation?


A good question. As is the one that needs to be addressed to Arny
Krueger: once a lawsuit had been filed against him for libel, why
did he repeat the libel on r.a.o.?


We all wonder about that, but only a couple of troublemakers would
pull the plug while the wheel is spinning, so to speak.

My question is whether Krooger will implode on RAO as he tries the
case in his mind, or whether he'll weather this version and go to
pieces after the real one.



Coming from RAO's great libeler George M. Middius this explanation
deprive the complainer from any credibility.

Mr. Atkinson should better ask :
- Why S888Wheel who has engaged a lawsuit against Arnold Krueger spend
so much time to debate of it ?
- Is S888Wheel really confident in the Californian and Federal laws ?

*My* answer would be :
- 50% because of Middius' incitations.
- 50% because of S888Wheel's propension to unshamed exhibitionism.

If he was really sincere S888Wheel would apply the French's adage :
"La vengeance est un plat qui se mange froid"
"Revenge is a dish which should be eaten cold"