"dave weil" wrote in message

On Wed, 22 Oct 2003 10:10:07 -0400, "Arny Krueger"
wrote:

Holt defined something related to the high end, but not the high end as
we
know it today or for the past 20 or more years. I'm actually pretty close
to
being a J.Gordon Holt volume 1 of Stereophile-type high end audio buff.
Remember that Holt also praised the ABX Comparator in print.

I'm glad that you were a subscriber to Stereophile while you were
still in early high school though.

You got that right. Remember, I started my first audio sales job
when I was in middle school.

No wonder you don't think there were high-end products in the early
60s.

As usual you've got a memory that is about 5 seconds long, Weil.

My claim is that there was no high end as we now it today, in the 60s. Can't
you remember what you read in the previous paragraph, Weil?

You know, it's funny - if I had made the statement that there were no
high-end products in the early 60s, you'd be calling me crazy.

Given that there's always a high end in any well-developed market, that
would be a pretty good supposition.

That's just the way you are.

It's called understanding things in detail that seems to always escape far
lesser minds like yours, Weil. Like the little words "as we know it today"
that I've just caught you dropping!

LOL!