My position is that no response to the suit will result in its dismissal.


Make up your mind. yesterday you were acknowledging you would loose the default
judgement. If the case is dismissed you win. Of course anyone who has read the
california Codes on default judgements would know that the only way Arny could
get a dismissal is if the allegations in the complaint don't add up to a cause
of action. Given the fact that I used the Bender book of forms for pleadings
there is very little chance of that.

Arny said

Thanks for contradicting sockpuppet wheel when he recently claimed that
there would be no fee. Of course, he's previously contradicted himself on
this issue, as well. Your clique is obviously coming unglued and so are its
individual members.

Thanks for showing you have limmited reading comprehension. Cite any claim I
have made that there is any fee for filing an answer to a lawsuit in California
Superior Court.


If this were a serious issue, there would be at least two separate
responses. One is a motion to quash on the grounds of personal jurisdiction.
The other would be an answer to the claims along with a clarification of the
information that the filer would ordinarily include, but that this filer
fraudulently left out. Little things like the name of the newsgroup and name
of the entity that was purportedly libeled.






And if arny had ever looked at the actual Codes on the issue he would have
figured out that he can challenge my identifability during the trial only.He
would also know that he has already lost that point. If arny had read the codes
and understood them he would know that he would be dead in the water on the
jurisdiction issue as well. Ignorance is bliss. Ignorance makes for an easy
victory in the court of Arny's mind. Obviously it is the fear of loosing in a
real court that keeps him from answering.