Arny said


Only if he was posting under a different name over in misc.legal a
few weeks ago when you got read the riot act, sockpuppet Wheel.

I said


Oh, I see, you are getting legal council from some clown that didn't
agree with me on a Usenet forum.

Arny said


You seemed to think that forum was great when you could misinterpret
comments there to sound like they agreed with you.


I asked for advice on how to procede with action against you. I never said it
was a great forum. OTOH you made a mockery of my asking advice on that forum
and them you went ahead and sought advice from that same forum. how pathetic is
that. you haven't really answered the question though, are you using some
clown you found on a Usenet forum as your legal council?

I said


That's a good choice. Please tell us
how I was "read the riot act' and please tell us what qualifications
the poster of this alleged reading of the riot act has on California
law.

Arny said


*Any* poster on that forum seemed to be an adequate authority for you when
you could misinterpret his comments to sound like they agreed with you.

You are clueless aren't you. One poster offered a few suggestions and I
considered some of them after consulting another source.

Arny said


This is a sufficiently savvy forum that your attempt at "Look over
there. Cake!" won't work for anybody but Middius and his clique.

I said


Can you say this in English?

Arny said


Just did sockpuppet Wheel.

yeah......

Arny said


BTW, why are you afraid to reveal how much you've spent on this little
vanity lawsuit?


Of course I am not afraid to disclose information that anyone with half a brain
and a phone line can find for themsleves. I just think it is funny that you got
such a simple fact wrong. It is typical of your fact finding in general when it
comes to California law and the courts.