"Bruce J. Richman" wrote in message


"TCS" wrote

There's in fact a very strong inverse correlation
between how much you spend and the quality
of cable.

TCS is just attempting, without any success, to con the public in to
accepting his OSAF. There is no evidence presented, in terms of
statistically significant results, to support his latest blather.

I can cite at least one real-world example being that Monster sells 16 gauge
speaker cable for a significantly higher price than any number of sources of
12 gauge speaker wire.

Thus you get less quality for more money with the high end cable source.

Another example. I have a set of Monster speaker cables that had a street
price of $449. They are again technically somewhat inferior to ordinary 12
gauge speaker wire, primarily because the $449 Monster Cable is
approximately 13 gauge.

Thus you get lower quality for more money with the high end cable source.
Again the claimed inverse relationship pointed out by TCS is shown to exist.

As we go through more and more examples, the pattern TCS suggests will be
shown to be true. This is because you can *always* find a wire that is
technically equal or superior to the high end source for a lower price.
AFAIK there are no examples.

Of course Richman, you can cite some real world examples of your own. Feel
free!