It works for clients who want to see what the job turned out like. So far I
haven't had any problems with DVD-r discs as far as client playability. But
then having any solution to a client NOT being able to play it is better
than a client not being able to play it.

--


Roger W. Norman
SirMusic Studio
http://blogs.salon.com/0004478/

"Mike Rivers" wrote in message
news:znr1110825948k@trad...

In article writes:

That's why I upgraded the DVD in the A64 to a DVD plus or minus R and
having
been doing my stuff in both formats to provide for clients. Don't know
what
the difference is, don't care. I only have the option of making certain
that what I give people is readable in their units

So what do you do? Make one DVD+ and one DVD-, send them both, and
tell your client to try the other one if the first one doesn't play?
That'll work for friends, but not very professional-impressive to
someone who doesn't know you or the artist representing himself with
your disks.

Is this the way things are today? I thought that I read that DVD+R was
the one to use if you wanted it to play on home players, and that
DVD-R would play in computers but may not play in home units.

Why is there even a distinction? Is there an advantage to using one
format over the other if both will play in a given device?

--
I'm really Mike Rivers )
However, until the spam goes away or Hell freezes over,
lots of IP addresses are blocked from this system. If
you e-mail me and it bounces, use your secret decoder ring
and reach me he double-m-eleven-double-zero at yahoo