"Lionel" wrote in message

dave weil wrote:

On Fri, 03 Oct 2003 22:49:52 +0200, Lionel
wrote:

dave weil wrote:

On Fri, 03 Oct 2003 22:29:03 +0200, Lionel
wrote:

One week ago Dave Weil told us :

* I will tell you the truth

"Stop speculating about my motives because you're overthinking
it. I simply want to report my opinion of the speakers without
bringing the designer's personality or methods into it. I've
never particularly cared about the "behind-the-scenes" stuff."

Highly ironic, given the Google record which shows Weil bragging about
conspiring against me with Graham. Maybe not ironic at all, but just another
example of Weil's wildly inconsistent behavior.

* I haven't no scruples

"I have no such scruples (either way). I don't care one whit about
hurting or helping him. In fact, I wouldn't be surprised if I
don't take a few hits from him when I express my opinions."

Exactly what scruples can we count on Weil having based on anything he's
ever said?

* Trotsky is cruel :

"Sure I would. Considering my history with Greg, it would be
delightful revenge. He's been *very* nasty to me countless times.
Nothing would please me more than to say that his speakers are a
pile of **** on a speaker stand. I'd be able to lord it over him
*and* push his buttons over and over again."

Dave Weil's stated life's goals - pushing other people's buttons.

So, tell me why I'm not commenting about his speakers since he
"humiliated" me. Shouldn't I be talking his speakers down right
about now? Isn't this the perfect opportunity for "revenge".

It appears that Weil has taken Singh's speakers down - in anticipation of
shipping them back to Singh. However, given the track record of both of
these liars, I still doubt that the speakers were ever shipped either way.
Anybody have a UPS tracking number as proof?

Maybe if you can put that foie gras brain of yours to work, you can
possibly find another reason why I'm not interested in commenting.

Weil again tries to substitute name-calling for candor.

Who is dismissed Dave ?

You are, of course.

After the name-calling, Weil tries to put on airs. As close as Weil has ever
come to putting on airs is what most of us call "Breaking Wind".

I give you a free advice Dave. As soon as possible you should take
$300.00 from your savings to manufacture the speakers of your
dreams. After that you can put your Klipschs in the nearest trash
box.

Interesting question - could a technical incompetent like Weil do a better
job of designing and building speakers than a technical incompetent like
Singh. Definitely a battle of two well-documented mental midgets with
delusions of audio grandeur.

You know what? Your advice is worth what I paid for it.

Well, this is RAO, is it not?

LOL !

You know, if I didn't know better, I'd say that you were Arnold in
disguise.

What Lionel and I share most is common is how easily and often we've
recently exposed Weil's dissembling, arrogance and ignorance.

You say that because you are angry.

Why am *I* angry?

You are humiliated and you don't want to recognize it.

Now *that's* funny. I'm humiliated and don't even know it. Don't you
have to know that you are humiliated before you can *be* humiliated?

Weil knows, he's just in denial.

What about your "waxing poetic or crap like that".

What about "waxing poetic or crap like that"?

ScottW was right : "You're an old man playing a childs game, Dave.
It makes you look foolish."

Agreeing with Scott simply makes *you* look foolish.

Here Weil sets himself as being THE superior authority of all of RAO.

I think it's *you* who can't get a handle on his anger. It started
with French heat deaths and hasn't stopped yet.

But that presumes that Weil would take responsibility for anything he's said
or done in the past.

In other words you ask :
"What are you doing here isn't it ?"

Dave you are the guy who stand alone in a concert room a long time
after musicians have left...

...In order to be sure that all the music, all the frequencies have
reach your ears.

LOL !

It's true that I ticketed Weil for agreeing that the speed of sound was
highly dependent on frequency which is of course simply not true.
Contemplate a person working at that subterranean level of ignorance trying
to provide a competent review of a high-end loudspeaker.

Dave since I was 8 years old I know that sound speed is a constant. I
use it to calculate the distance from my house to a rainstorm.
Dave, in a way Trotsky is right you are a "poseur"

I've been proving that with facts and logic for years.

I'm waiting for Middius to figure this all out and start criticizing Weil.
The Google record shows that Middius was about 4 years behind me when it
came to seeing through Singh. he might be true to form if he finally "gets
it" about Weil.