On Mon, 29 Sep 2003 05:55:26 -0400, "Arny Krueger"
wrote:

"Michael Mckelvy" wrote in message


Yes. In both places Singh made a bet that he lost. The terms of
which were that if he lost he would not post here again. If he broke
his word then, what reason do we have to assume he will keep it, ever?

Exactly. Now that's we have some evidence from Weil (****-poor evidence
considering the source, but nevertheless some kind of evidence)

C'mon Arnold, either you belive me or not. If you think I'm such a bad
observer, then perhaps *you* were wrong about your conclusions, since
you can't take what I say with even a grain of salt.

that Singh's speakers are as bad as we have been predicting, in the ways we have
predicting, there are even more reasons to look elsewhere for good speakers.

You're shooting yourself in the foot here.

Of course I knew that you'd find fault. I was going to tag the review
with a sarcastic line about waiting for your carping, but I decided
not to and just let you carp away.

Of course, *you* would never attempt such a review. You don't have the
balls or the character.