John Atkinson wrote:

Don Pearce wrote:
Just tried to find the relevant article on the Stereophile
website...Can you explain how best to drive your search engine?

The 1991 Armor All coverage is not yet posted in our on-line
archives. I am slowly working my way through the older material
and it should be available in the late Spring.

My suggestion to Mr. Fesrtler, BTW, was not so much for him to
find this material and read it (though that would be worth
his while, of course), but that he should try harder to refrain
from commenting on articles that he hasn't read at all. That
way, his comments would be more pertinent, perhaps even helpful.

It has been years since I read that article, and I must
admit that once I got into it a bit I did not spend a lot of
additional time reading closely. I simply meditated on the
premise for a few seconds and then decided that the article
was idiotic. It would have been idiotic, even if Armor All
had not damaged the discs.

PS: I do use the product on the appropriate areas of my
cars. I am not anti Armor All.

Howard Ferstler