View Single Post
  #15   Report Post  
Don Pearce
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On 4 Mar 2005 04:40:07 -0800, "John Atkinson"
wrote:


Howard Ferstler wrote:
John Atkinson wrote:
As I pointed out, damaged from the scratches that could result
from the ArmorAll application. These scratches can be polished
out.


So, you basically say that it is no big deal.


No, that is not what I said.

If somebody damaged a couple of dozen (or more) compact discs,
they can get to work and polish out the scratches.


Yes, but if they applied the Armorall correctly, they would
not have scracthed the discs.

it is also possible that Armor All could potentially damage
the label side of a disc.


It is possible, which is why Armor All should not be applied
to the label side. I suggest you read what Stereophile actually
wrote about this tweak before you wonder off into your own world
of wander, Mr. Ferstler.

John Atkinson
Editor, Stereophile


Just tried to find the relevant article on the Stereophile website -
typed "Armor All" into the search box, and got a whole heap of
apparently irrelevant articles. Can you explain how best to drive your
search engine?

d

Pearce Consulting
http://www.pearce.uk.com