"Bruce J. Richman" wrote

Since today is September 20, 2003 and according
to Scott Wheeler, D-Day, I'll sign my name with the
degree which I've earned:

Scott will take a powder on that issue... it was all
bravado.

It remains to be seen. Time will tell.

Ok, what is a reasonable time for you to change
your opinion on the existence of the litigation...
10 day, 30 days? The failure to perform needn't
dash your spirits. Maybe someday Arny really will
cross the line... hope remain eternal, after all .

You're assuming a "failure to perform" for which there
is no evidence, as of yet.

Yes, I agree that if the paperwork is properly
completed to the satisfaction of the clerk it will be
recorded as is proper and right... only to die a
natural death, *no cause for action*. Is that the
victory you seek?


As for "time limits", I've yet to hear of libel litigation
that gets settled in 30 days - although I suppose an
out-of-court settlement is always a possibility.

Only if you send money to Scott for legal
representation, Bruce .


Krueger has crossed the line many times with
many people in RAO - so hope has nothing to
do with it.

You're speaking to the choir.


The fact that many have chosen to let this
documented liar and libeler get away with his
regular character assassination smears
doesn't mean he hasn't crossed the line. It just
indicates that many simply don't think c-l-K is
worth bothering with.

"get away with"... ultimately what does he get
really get away with? Could you quantify those
feelings, please? Then balance those with
USEnet's intent and the requirement for *real
damages* for litigious actions. I'm not in
disagreement about Arny's lack of civility or
that he has caused emotional hardship on
some... I empathize for them. Arny is a
metaphor for the wrecking ball challenging
your norms and standards of conduct. My own
read is that Arny influence extends for no further
than his ability to outpost (noise) anyone here.

"worth bothering"... all men seek glory... that's
a common universal archetype, Bruce .