View Single Post
  #49   Report Post  
MiNe 109
 
Posts: n/a
Default

In article ,
Fred Nachbaur wrote:

MiNe 109 wrote:
In article ,
George M. Middius wrote:


MiNe 109 said:


Passive I-V conversion sounds so much better ...... than any op-amp/SS !!
Even a step-up tranny is an option ....... without the use of a tube ....

You're reading this in RATech, aren't you?

I knew there was an invisible newsgroup in that list. But I
thought it was the one where Krooger believes he has unfettered
license for ****fulness without fear of "humiliation".



That's the one. Now for a musician joke: I-ii-V7-I.


Sorry, though I'm a musician and know what I-ii-V7-I means, I don't get
the joke. ???


It's not a good joke, but it's what I thought of when confronted by a
"Passive I-V conversion". A better joke might be to call it a "dependent
transition".

Stephen