"dave weil" wrote in message

On Wed, 16 Jul 2003 10:26:03 -0400, "Arny Krueger"
wrote:

"dave weil" wrote in message

On Wed, 16 Jul 2003 09:25:28 -0400, "Arny Krueger"
wrote:

"dave weil" wrote in message
news On Wed, 16 Jul 2003 06:09:00 -0400, "Arny Krueger"
wrote:

"Öökintölli" wrote in message


Need a really good tube CD/SACD/DVD player to replace my current
Sony piece of junk. I would also consider separate transport and
tube processor.

There is no such thing as a tube optical disc player. There never
will be such a thing. Were such a thing to be built, it would be
the size of a house or larger. What you may find some day is a
solid state optical disc player with a few thermionic noise and
distortion enhancers slapped on, right before the output
terminals. Why would someone who is interested in pure natural
sound want such a thing?

Just to **** you off?

If you're observing that the original post was probably just a
troll...

;-)

Or maybe they knew that you'd post a typically biased and useless
answer...

As if you don't flood this place with biased and useless posts of
your own, Weil.

I don't deny a certain bias some of my posts. However, I rarely diss
people that are reasonable.

What's the official defintion of *reasonable*, Weil. There is none - its
entirely subjective. In short you just said that you only dis people that
you feel like dissing, which we knew already. However you tried to cloak
your behavior with a positive word like "reasonable".

I usually only diss the extremists, like you for instance.

That would be extremist in your opinion, Weil. Since you've shown yourself
again and again to be extremely backward w/r/t modern technology, that makes
you an extermist in your own right.

;-) (just for you, Arnold)

On that day in the distant future when you find your first clue
Weil, why not post again?

And why don't you stay out of threads in which you have no intention
of being helpful?

I think that disabusing people of extremist and backward views w/r/t modern
technology is among the most helpful things that I can do.

Why pollute a simple question with your own agenda?

It's not pollution, it's an attempt at clearing the waters of ignorant
Luddite, anti-digital, anti-solid state, anti-modern-technology extremism.