By his own admission, Arny's hifi uses QSC PA amps.
Capable of earsplitting volume that makes fan noise irrelevant, I found
these amps to have a muddy, unrevealing presentation.

Arny and Mickey have implied that my hearing may not be good enough to
detect that a QSC is less revealing than other amps I prefer more.

They were prompted to say this because I've said that Arny said my hearing
may not be good enough to detect that there are more revealing amplifiers.

I'm wondering about the logic of Arny's statement.
Is it unassailable? Am I missing some crucial logical flaw in the
Arny/Mickey retort that would allow me to catch them in a logical
contradiction?

Also, I said that Arny's hearing is probably not particularly acute. Does
that automatically imply my hearing is not acute?

Anyone who can help me with these terribly difficult conundrums is invited
to respond.

Should I, a talentless person, be permitted to make this post? Hey, I got
rhythm!

I got rhythm, I got music, I got my (wo)man
Who could ask for anything more?
I got daisies In green pastures, I got my (wo)man
Who could ask for anything more?

Old Man Trouble I don't mind him,
You won't find him 'round my door.
I got starlight, I got sweet dreams,
Who could ask for anything more?