A few tech questions
Michael Mckelvy wrote:
"trotsky" wrote in message
...
Michael Mckelvy wrote:
Mr. Singh:
What software if any do you own and did you use to help you design the
xovers in your speakers?
What topology ar the xovers?
Where might one get a glimpse of their frequency response, phase, polar
response, etc.?
Mr. Mickey: are you a potential customer?
Unlikely.
Do you know anybody that is
likely to be a potential customer?
I know lots of people, many of them audiophiles. I would certainly mention
your website and let them decide for themselves.
You would mention them under what conditions--that I use the necessary
meters and measurements? That's a flat out lie.
Do you think there is anything more
to be said after listening to the speakers for the 45 day evaluation
period?
I think that the questions I asked are reasonable and that you should have
no problem answering them.
I think the questions you asked aren't reasonable. I don't do
measurements. I even (gasp!) guessed at the efficiency. I think its a
pretty educated guess, though. If things go as planned, dave weil
should have my spare pair to evaluate next week. I'm more interested in
people's opinions of the sound than I am in hearing about how many
graphs I'm supposed to have at my disposal.
I'm not trying to trick you, I am curious.
In the case of my own speakers I used LEAP and LMS. The xovers were 3rd
order on the tweeter and 2nd order on the woofer.
My crossovers are second order, designed by LEAP.
I provided graphs upon request, can you?
I could, but I won't because I don't think they tell you a thing about
the sound. Lots of speakers have a flat frequency response and still do
many things wrong.
What aspects of crossover design do you find most important?
What are the choices?
What is your approach to good stereo imaging?
Position the speakers correctly in the room. Very few manufacturers
cover this well. I don't know why.
Do you favor even order or odd order crosovers?
What ever yields the best sounding response is what I favor.
|