Arny Krueger wrote:
wrote in message
ups.com
Arny Krueger wrote:
"George M. Middius" wrote in message



. You embraced the seemingly
bizarre notion that the Krooborg and its "objectivist" ilk have a
meaningful viewpoint,

This statement is so flawed that it can't be a mere grotesque
error.

First off, I'm not an objectivist, I'm a subjectivist. I'm simply
a
subjectivist who has progressed far enough beyond the absolute and
total
naivet=E9 that Middius preaches, to see some value in considering
issues
relating to the reliability of human perceptions.

Secondly, the idea that the objectivists lack a meaningful
viewpoint is
falsified by the years of effort that Middius has put into
attacking it.
Or
perhaps Middius wants us to believe that he truly is the
reincarnation
of
Don Quixote, and his zillions of diatribes against mainstream
scientific
thought as applied to audio are simply jousts with slow-moving
windmill
blades.

Notice that "George M. Middius" ran away from that quote where
Atkinson said he felt the debate with you was "necessary"?

What is new? It's a given that if you back Middius or Atkinson into a

corner, one of their dumbed-down buddies like Sackman, Scott, Weil,
Rudy,
Borgma or whoever will chime in with some stupid retort.



This debate is turning out to be quite a debacle for "Middius". First,
his prediction and wager that you would never agree to appear for the
debate now makes him appear to be an ass. Next, his hero, "Lord
Atkinson" (a "Middius term, BTW) admits that he feels the debate is
necessary, not something Atkinson deigns to do so he can trifle with
you.


No wonder "Middius" disappeared! ;-)