wrote in message
ups.com
Arny Krueger wrote:
"George M. Middius" wrote in message



. You embraced the seemingly
bizarre notion that the Krooborg and its "objectivist" ilk have a
meaningful viewpoint,

This statement is so flawed that it can't be a mere grotesque error.

First off, I'm not an objectivist, I'm a subjectivist. I'm simply a
subjectivist who has progressed far enough beyond the absolute and total
naiveté that Middius preaches, to see some value in considering issues
relating to the reliability of human perceptions.

Secondly, the idea that the objectivists lack a meaningful viewpoint is
falsified by the years of effort that Middius has put into attacking it.
Or
perhaps Middius wants us to believe that he truly is the reincarnation
of
Don Quixote, and his zillions of diatribes against mainstream scientific
thought as applied to audio are simply jousts with slow-moving windmill
blades.

Notice that "George M. Middius" ran away from that quote where
Atkinson said he felt the debate with you was "necessary"?

What is new? It's a given that if you back Middius or Atkinson into a
corner, one of their dumbed-down buddies like Sackman, Scott, Weil, Rudy,
Borgma or whoever will chime in with some stupid retort.