On Wed, 10 Sep 2003 12:32:03 -0400, "Arny Krueger"
wrote:

"dave weil" wrote in message

On Wed, 10 Sep 2003 12:07:47 -0400, "Arny Krueger"
wrote:

That may be true, considering the number of errors you make.
However, you probably have the worst ratio of errors/ADMITTED
errors than anyone who posts on any audio group in USENET.

As if you're qualified to determine when I've made technical errors,
Weil. As if you've admitted to even a tiny fraction of the technical
errors you've made.

First of all, I didn't restrict it to "technical errors", nor did you
specify "tecnical errors" in your original claim.

Well Weil, that agrees with your well-known habit of treating typos and
imperfect syntax as a federal case when you're cornered.

No, it agrees with me busting you for changing the context.

Of course I didn't specify "tecnical errors". Anybody can see why.

This is true.

The only thing I'm sorry about with this typo is that it allowed you
to avoid responsibility.

Second of all, I'm pretty much on record as *instantly* and
*unequivocally* admitting when I make a mistake.

That's a laugh. One word: Revox. One phrase: 18 mm Xmax.

As to the first, I don't know *what* you're talking about. As to the
second, I thanked you for supplying the data for a speaker with 18 mm
xmax, didn't I? First of all, I don't think I ever made a mistake when
it came to the xmax of speakers - I simply asked you to provide an
example, and you did and I instantly acknowledged it.

I don't use quibble
words, nor attempt to avoid responsibility, even when the correction
comes from you.

ROTFLMAO!

Glad that you're amused.