"Lionel" wrote in message

dave weil a écrit :
On Tue, 8 Feb 2005 10:11:14 -0500, "Arny Krueger"
wrote:


Thanks Borglet for admitting that my comments hit you so hard that
you are speechless.

More posturing.

Is there any other way to discuss anything with Borglet?

That debate is going to be a slam-dunk for Mr. Atkinson, unless you
can organize your thoughts better and keep from relying on the cheap
taunt. I don't see that as very likely, considering your telephone
demeanor.

*GAG ALERT !!!!!*

Indeed, if irony killed.

Dave and his pertinent, intelligent, arguments.... :-)

Remember that Weil has a long and impressive track record related to
technical analysis and technical writing, His magnificent intellectual
successes include dropping out of college, operating a 50 caliber machine
gun clipped to the the top of an APC while presumably a forced guest of
Uncle Sam in Germany, and waiting on tables in a bar that is so bad that he
won't publicly identify it.

Here, he is comparing a prepared meeting with an importune,
impromptu phone call with a drunk interlocutor.

You forgot the part where the drunk interlocutor already had a lengthy
track record of making morally rephensible posts on RAO related to the
untimely and natural death of my son. Then there's the drunk interlocoutor's
panning for sympathy with a lie about his daughter dying of cancer. The same
person also made pornographic claims related to my wife, complete with
purported photographs of my wife including one a woman executing fellatio in
public. Dave can't possibly relate to my situation since he has no children
that he is willing to accept responsibility for in public, and of course
there's no wife he's willing to admit to.

Furthermore it is arguable that Dave empathises positively with Devil's
false claims related to my son's tragic death because of the unfortunate
circumstances related to the death of Dave's dad. Note that I'd know nothing
of this personal tragedy except that Dave posted the gory details including
I believe make and model of gun, on RAO on a certain Christmas day,
presumably to cheer us all up or more likely to panhandle for pity. Weird or
what?

Considering the quality of your above argumentation Dave, I
think it's better that you let Arnold Krueger debate alone.

Lionel, you've missed some incredible instances where Weil wet himself here.
For instance, his arguing opinion against fact about Revox open reel tape
recorders and their market position in the US during the late 1960s and
early 1970s. It finally developed that Dave had some experience with selling
Revox cassette tape recorders to Gi's in Europe about 10 years later. He was
basing his opinons on that. Note that in Weil world, the major market
changes, differences and changes in dollar/mark exchange rates were
meaningless.

Then there was Dave's lengthy and illogical argument against my opinion that
hard drive-based music jukeboxes were a superior alternative to CD changers.
Note his backward-looking arguments put Dave in the odd position of
essentially arguing that the Apple iPod could never suceed.

No, there are many reasons why Dave is likely to tell just about any lie
that pops into his head to harass me. Most of the reasons are his own fault.