"trotsky" wrote in message
nk.net...
Arny Krueger wrote:

Singh, I don't know how you can attack my family and call yourself a
human.

We're not talking about me, Arny.

No, I'm talking to the wall.

I'm an atheist, I'm already going to Hell according to your mythology.

Judging by the pained, irrational noises you make Singh, you are already in
Hell.

We're talking about the mockery you make of your faith.

But Singh you already said that faith is irrational. How can you then use
reason to judge it?

Audio is audio, and fun is fun, but your attacks on my family members
should
be beneath even your vanishingly-small ethics.

Arny, now you're just not being truthful. Suddenly you have rules of
engagement? I think not.

I have very definite rules of engagement. If you were capable of abstract
thinking Singh, I'd invite you to consider what I'd say to you without some
rules of engagement in force.

But thanks again for proving that my comments have so much impact on
you,
Singh. Maybe one day you'll learn to have some respect for technology
and
technologists.

Not if they're all dirty birds like you, no.

Singh, I've generally treated you much more gently than others here. The
first layer of gloves came off only after you attacked my family, and even
then I've been pulling all my figurative punches.

And for some reason, every time I bring up the
mockery you've made of your "faith" you don't seem to have a response,

That's yet another lie. I respond, I even quote the Bible.

Sure, with an incorrect interpretation.

Thanks for admitting that you lied, Singh. How do we know when you slip up
and tell the truth?

Like Atkinson
likes to do, you've confused a response you don't like with no response.

No, I correctly labeled a poorly thought out response as such.

That's not what you said, Singh. I can't believe you think everybody is so
stupid that they aren't going to back up about 6 lines and read what you
actually said.

even though you have the biggest cyber mouth in the history of Usenet.

Please define "cyber mouth", prove that it fits, and explain why it's a
problem.

no response, showing that Singh just throws this garbage out without any
thought

How do you explain this?

I feel strongly about telling the truth and do it early and often.

But not all the time?

That isn't what I said.

When do we know when you're lying?

You don't. This differs from you Singh, where the more interesting problem
is detecting those rare moments when you slip up and tell the truth.

Probably too early and too often, but hey a guy has to have a little
fun in his life,
no?

If you describe "fun" as not behaving like a Christian, then I guess so.

Letsee Singh, you say that Christianity is mythology (i.e., lies), but you
also claim that you're a leading Christianity expert. That makes you an
expert liar, right? But are you lying when you say that?