Michael McKelvy wrote:
ludovic mirabel"" wrote



Now about "audio. low-end". You're right - no group so
titled exists. But there is a group that was started long, long
ago as a high-end group and that is now in the grip of
second-raters, without an original, creative thought in their
heads and without any interest in getting life-like instrumental
sound, aided and abetted by Mr. Bath, the moderator..

By that, can we assume that you mean they don't like to stray
from what is provable into what is wishful thinking?


Their check-mate slogan is the one "Richard" put at the end
of his message: "Prove it by ABXing". And their main purpose
is to shoot down anything outstanding because they either can
not or do not care to hear the difference,
And ,no, I was not banned.

Until there is a better way to prove subtle difference, ABX is
what one uses.

The BBC as I showed in another thread used DBT's extensively
to update their studio speakers. They did this because they know
DBT's work.

Neither temporarily nor
"permanently. I quit like many others, regretting that a true
high-end forum ceased to exist
My use of "Low-end" was what they call " a figure of

speech". In my native language it is known as "sarcasm". I think
the word exists in English as well. Look it up in your Public
Library reference/dictionary section.

Regards Ludovic Mirabel


Sarcasm is what they use when talking about your obsession with
teh fact that ABX and DBT's in general are the standard for
determining subtle differences. It's the way it is because it works.

One only need peruse the pages of some of the subjectivist rags
to see how wrong subjective review processes can be, how
much they can miss about how good or bad something is until
compared to an objective reference.


Listen, Mother Fuc****, part of your problem is that your talking
about something that is somewhat not directly related to the
fuc** issue here.