"ludovic mirabel" elmir2m @pacificcoast.net wrote in message
...
Dear non-Richard. You raise so many fascinating points that with my
limited English I hardly know where to begin.( how can I, a non-native
speaker, compete with your unrivalled mastery of the RAO prose?)
For instance Ludo is a clown. Was it meant as an endearment,
insult, uninvited familiarity or all three? Till you explain I shall not
know how you'd want me to address you?..
Thank you for so lucidly explaining that a ban is not a ban
when it is not "permanent" Shall we call it a "non-permanent ban"? Please
explain and inform: does " non-permanent" mean something that you lift
when a "Richard" says something you like and clamp on again when someone
wants to answer him?
Now about "audio. low-end". You're right - no group so titled
exists. But there is a group that was started long, long ago as a high-end
group and that is now in the grip of second-raters, without an original,
creative thought in their heads and without any interest in getting
life-like instrumental sound, aided and abetted by Mr. Bath, the
moderator..

By that, can we assume that you mean they don't like to stray from what is
provable into what is wishful thinking?


Their check-mate slogan is the one "Richard" put at the end of his
message: "Prove it by ABXing". And their main purpose is to shoot down
anything outstanding because they either can not or do not care to hear
the difference,
And ,no, I was not banned.

Until there is a better way to prove subtle difference, ABX is what one
uses.

The BBC as I showed in another thread used DBT's extensively to update their
studio speakers. They did this because they know DBT's work.

Neither temporarily nor
"permanently. I quit like many others, regretting that a true high-end
forum ceased to exist
My use of "Low-end" was what they call " a figure of
speech". In my native language it is known as "sarcasm". I think the word
exists in English as well. Look it up in your Public Library
reference/dictionary section.
Regards Ludovic Mirabel

Sarcasm is what they use when talking about your obsession with teh fact
that ABX and DBT's in general are the standard for determining subtle
differences. It's the way it is because it works. One only need peruse
the pages of some of the subjectivist rags to see how wrong subjective
review processes can be, how much they can miss about how good or bad
something is until compared to an objective reference.