On Mon, 8 Sep 2003 10:27:28 -0400, "Arny Krueger"
wrote:

"dave weil" wrote in message

On Mon, 8 Sep 2003 10:16:03 -0400, "Arny Krueger"
wrote:

"Arny Krueger" wrote in message

Those of us who have remained skeptical after reading glowing
reports of tremendously improved sound quality due to the wider
bandwidth of SACD and DVD-A can find quite a bit of vindication in
this report:

http://world.std.com/~griesngr/intermod.ppt

Basically it shows that SACDs come in two flavors - those with
absolutely no music above 22 KHz (your typical remastered recording)
or those with negligible music above 22 KHz (your typical new
recording).

The author of this report is a well-known expert who has been
studying the requirements for more lifelike reproduction of music
for decades, and has a number of successful products to his credit.

I see just another indication of how unreliable the high end
establishment is as a source of information about what actually
sounds better.

Notice that David Weil our local SACD/DVD-A promoter, has posted
replies to many posts of mine since I put this one up, but not this
one.

Must be Kryptonite!

No, must be that I can't read powerpoint documents.

Since obviously you need a clue so badly Weil, let me point out

http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/d...F-058A84A37DF1

Snideness, notwithstanding, thank you.