"Richard" says:
I don't believe that's a quote of what the moderators actually said.
There is ABX discussion on the group from time to time, although not
much lately.

From: David E. Bath )
Subject: All DBT or Subjective/Objective threads are ended



View this article only
Newsgroups: rec.audio.high-end
Date: 2004-07-28 16:35:20 PST

Due to the limited time the moderators now have to process posts, all
DBT or objective/subjective threads are ended. This is effective as
of the Date of this post, and is likely to stay in effect at least
until the moderation team has grown.

Please see the request for moderators post for an explanation why our
time is limited.

And please don't bother to plead "but I didn't get to respond...", it
will fall on deaf ears.

--
---------------------------------------------------------------------
-.- David Bath (rec.audio.high-end moderation team)
---------------------------------------------------------------------Please,
do explain what did the moderator "actually" say to your unique brain
cortex.. We need a clever, scholastic exegesis .
He says also::
" I believe that is a very samll part of the actual post and not the
focus of it at all.

I suppose that was why "actually" you put your "ABX" sentence as
the final one-two blow at the very end of your mesage..
Ludovic Mirabel




elmir who? wrote in message ...
In article ,
"ludovic mirabel" elmir2m @pacificcoast.net writes:

Here goes one-out of many- example of the rec.audio.low-end moderating
objectivity, Fidel Castro style.

I can't seem to find a newsgroup with that name. Please point it out
to me.

An invocation extolling unvalidated, unconfirmed by basic research
"testing"goes in as a clinching argument .

Ah, but try and question it!: "We do not allow discussion of ABX"

I don't believe that's a quote of what the moderators actually said.
There is ABX discussion on the group from time to time, although not
much lately.

We only allow it in to end discussions, right?

Ludovic Mirabel

Message 24 in thread

From: Richard )
Subject: Stereophile again!

Newsgroups: rec.audio.high-end
Date: 2005-01-25 17:00:04 PST


... "The simple answer to all this is to incorporate ABX testing
ESPECIALLY
on controversial tweaks. Of course if printing facts were what it is
about
then it would be happening already."

Richard

I believe that is a very samll part of the actual post and not the
focus of it at all.

Can you say "sour grapes"?

Can you also say "who cares"?