"GeoSynch" wrote in message
k.net...
I wrote:

This Google search returns 2 phone numbers for Scott Wheelers in CA,
one residing in Benicia and the other in Glendale:

http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&i...t+Wheeler%22+C
A

Is either one of them you, Scott?

There's even more Scott Wheelers, including a few attornies:
http://www.google.com/search?sa=X&oi...+Wheeler%22+CA

Looks like you may be in trouble here, Arny.

Even if Scott does not ultimately prevail in his lawsuit against you, it
appears that you're
going to have to spend quite a bit of money to defend yourself, whereas
Scott will be
getting all the legal advice he needs for free from his father.

Nahh.

Holy guacomole, even more Scott Wheelers, 21 in total:
http://www.google.com/search?sa=X&oi...+Wheeler%22+CA

You just came up with another reason why any suit filed by any of the 21 or
more Scott Wheeler's would be laughed out of court were he stoopid enough to
waste his money filing.

Libel is harm to a specific individual or legal entity or legal class
thereof.

Since the most I can possibly know is that "Scott Wheeler" is one of 21 or
more different people in California (none of them have specifically
identified themselves to me), it's impossible for any of the 21 or more
Scott Wheelers to prove in court that I specificially libelled him.

Because I am well-known on RAO to be a very specific person (one with a
proper address and published picture) it comes down to the ironic fact that
sockpuppet wheel can libel me, but until he properly establishes his
identity, he can't properly be libelled.

IOW there's a lot more reasons why I can sue Greg Singh, Marc Phillips or
George Middius, than reasons why sockpuppet Wheel can sue me. Obviously,
Greg Singh is the easiest target since he lives so close, and is so easy to
trace down through his new business.

Come to think of it, this would be public service I could perform. I could
sue Greg for libel, and save lots of people from wasting their money on his
speakers.

LOL!