View Single Post
  #30   Report Post  
Carl Valle
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Carl Valle" wrote in message
m...

"Arny Krueger" wrote in message
...
"Carl Valle" wrote in message
om
"Arny Krueger" wrote in message
...


Carl, I've challenged you to properly document you claims before, and
you've responded with bluster and blunder, but zero relevant faqcts.
Wanna clean up your act this time?


You are wrong about iTunes, you have to de-authorize your computer to
move the files.


Carl I guess you don't know about the CD-burning features of iTunes. It's
kind of hard to de-authorize a burned CD, isn't it?

I was referring actually to the fact that since the mp3 is
available from a copyright holder, there is no longer defense in
claiming that it is neccessary to copy the work in order to enjoy the
formt.


A defense that is unecessary in the real world.

If you violate the use agreement by making multiple copies, it
is still a copyright violation.


There is no violation, so this is an irrelevant, not to mention bogus
comment.

ITunes does not authorize copyright violations.


It can stop them.

The music you purchase, which you claim gives you liscense, does not
give you permission to make derivative copies. In fact the opposite
is true.


Prove it Carl, an act that you've been incapable of accomplishing for the
better part of a year, now. Yawn.

Evidence? How about the statement on the package label. "Any
duplication of this recording is prohibited under copyright."


I just looked at a number of my CDs and found that as usual Carl, you're
not accurately quoting the statement that I found there.

How about the FBI warning that is on all videotape and DVD. Does this
not document my claim? What more do you need?


Lame attempt to drag in a debating trade red herring - discussion of
video in an audio thread, noted.

Are you saying that the copyright notice on the recordings does not
limit your rights to make derivatives? You are wrong. I don't need
any more evidence than that.


Given how you've distorted the evidence that you're presenting Carl, I
think this discussion is over.




You think?
The discussion is over because you can't face the fact that you are wrong.
You cannot provide a single example of a license for a music product that
gives you the right to copy it.
Carl



For the record -

off the back of Elektra 7559-61135-4
(C) 1992 Elektra Div. Warner Communications
All Rights Reserved
Warning: Unauthorized reproduction of this recording is prohibited by
Federal law and subject to criminal prosecution

Carl