On Mon, 1 Sep 2003 21:00:04 -0400, "Arny Krueger"
wrote:

"S888Wheel" wrote in message

I said


arny's "fate" on this matter is still in his own hands until such
time after the 20th of September should he choose not to do the right
thing and the smart thing and simply comply with the demands made in
my letter of intent to sue. Once a lawsuit is filed there is no such
easy resolution left and Arny's "fate" will be in the hands of the
court here in California.



Arny said


First prove your legal identity. If you can't or won't do that, you
can't go to court.



I will have no trouble proving my legal identity to the court.

However, that's not where you claim you were defamed, sockpuppet "Wheel".
It's difficult for you to even prove that you were in fact the person who
was posting on rec.audio.opinion when the alleged libel took place. You have
even more difficulties establishing who was actually posting when the
alleged post from me (which you repeatedly misrepresent) was made.

I see no point in trying to prove anything to you.

Until you prove to me that you are a legal entity, why should I take your
legal claims seriously, sockpuppet "Wheel"?

If your inability to
apply logic to facts is so intense that you would conclude that I am
homeless because you failed to read the return address on the receipt
of a registered letter, I see trying to prove anything to you is a
waste of time.

Sockpuppet Wheel, I was prevented by an official of the U.S. Post Office
from reading that information. You had one opportunity to represent yourself
as a credible individual which you blew when you failed when you failed to
put any return address on the envelope. You basically just ****ed your
money away when you failed to put a return address on that envelope.

If you were being reasonable about this it would be
obvious to you that I am a real person as it seems to be obvious to
just about everyone else.

What is obvious sockpuppet Wheel is that you are a liar and a fool many
times over.

(1) The purported libel took place on a newsgroup where every post is
"opinion".

(2) The entity that was purportedly being libeled had and has no legal
standing, being an anonymous figment of your imagination.

(3) The purported libel never took place, and all of your representations of
what was actually said are false.


I suspect that if I were to e mail you a
picture of myself with my drivers license, passport and school
records you would claim they could all be someone else.

Obviously true.

I will save my efforts for the courts.

The courts don't protect the rights of anonymous sockpuppets because they
have none.

This is *so* hilarious. If you weren't such an evil ****, you'd be
very popular, you know! You seem to have no idea how *hilarious* it is
to see you claiming your postman prevents you from reading your own
mail! The lengths to which you'll go to 'save face' (when, everyone
can see, your face was shorn off long ago, by your own manic fingers,
to be carried away in the gales from your stupidly yelling gob-hole).

Oh, wait. Maybe Mr Postman knows you well enough to realise that, were
you to be *given* your mail as normal people are given *their* mail,
there stands the very real possibility of you decapitating yourself
with the most unbelievable paper cut in the history of trees.

Yes, I'm getting it now. Just as normal people find no difficulty
reading a document or form to which they must put their signature,
normal people don't have any trouble opening a letter! But how could
any normal person know what a nightmare that task must be to someone
like *you*? (You do clean your teeth with an electric can-opener,
right?)

No, actually, that can't be it. If Mr Posty knew you well enough to
foresee you decapitating yourself with a letter of intent to sue, he'd
be giving you reams of legal paper for your birthday.

Ok, so what's the deal on this postman? Make something else up. It'll
be great!

--
Oily Tartlet