Arny Krueger wrote:

"Bruce J. Richman" wrote in message
oups.com

What's really laughable about Krueger's baseless claims of
prejudice
by the moderators is the well-known fact tha RAHE is by and large
one
of the few discussion groups on Usenet where proponents of
Krueger's
dogma are often found - e.g. Pinkerton, Chung, Sullivan, etc.

None of them happen to be the guy who built the first ABX comparator
or did
the first ABX test. None of them are the proprietor of the PCABX web
site.
I've got a far stronger background in DBTs than just about anybody
who posts
on Usenet these days. In essence, the guys who remain are my
disciples.


Bull****. There is no evidence that they depended in any way, shape,
or form on Krueger's dogma for arriving at their views. As the
megalomaniacal (as indicated by the above ludicrous claim) likes to say
about others that he smears........ "delusions of omniscience noted".

It is also totally irrelevant to the factual observation that no
evidence has been produced to indicate that Krueger's posts were ever
rejected because of pro-dbt statements. So once again, absent any
evidence substantiating Krueger's claim, it is fair for us to conclude
that he is lying.

Krueger would have a very hard time explaining why they are allowed
to post on RAHE freely while he has been banned.

It's easy, I'm by far the stronger advocate of DBTs. Check our
respective
track records. Many of my posts have driven some of the golden ears
over
there like Harry Lavo absolutely nuts, based on their posts that
somehow
made it through moderation.


Since there is absolutely no evidence on RAHE that Harry Lavo "is nuts"
or that Krueger's claimed effects have had that effect on any RAHE
poster, Krueger is clearly lying when he makes that statement.

He is also lying when he claims he was discriminated against because of
his strong pro-dbt views.


Unlike some of Krueger's, their posts have made it through moderation
because, in the judgment of the moderators, they have not crossed the
line and engaged in personal attacks. Krueger cnn't say that about his
posts, however.



Obviously, it has
nothing to do with his beliefs, and everything to do with his
antisocial behavior direted towards the moderators on RAHE.

Richman arrogantly and stupidly contradicts recent statements by a
RAHE
moderator that it was my criticism of the moderators as posted on RAO
that
got me banned:



Krueger self-righteously and falsely contradicts the statements of
David Bath thaT he was banned because of his criticisms of the
moderators on RAHE - as posted on RAO. News Alert - Krueger's decision
to smear the RAHE moderators by making statements about them on RAO
which apparently David Bath (and perhaps other moderators) thought were
inapropriate - IS ANTISOCIAL BEHAVIOR.


David E. Bath" wrote in message


"He was banned for his comments on RAO about the moderators, nothing
more."

Since Richman responded to a post that quoted this information, he
can't
plead ignorance. His false claim about the facts of this matter can't
be
blamed on ignorance. This is absolute proof that Richman is a liar.



Krueger's attempt to spin reality is pretty transparent. The RAHE
moderators, as reported by David Bath, banned Krueger because of his
criticisms of RAHE on another NG, namely, RAO. That behavior of
Krueger's was, apparently, as indicated by their actions and
decisioins. both inappropriate and antisocial. If that had not been
the case, perhaps they would have let him continue there/

Krueger is a proven liar - just as he has been shown to be many times
before - when he tries to rationalize and justify the reasons for his
being banished. Since he has prsented no evidence to indicate that the
moderators EVER rejected one of his posts because it was pro-dbt, it is
fair to conclude that he is also lying about this as well.

IOW, he's lied about their moderating practices and got caught.

In fact my comments were factual, and documented.

Krueger has once again been caught lying, as is the habit of this
transparent charlatan and intellectually challenged fool Hde has
predictably tried to shift the blame for his antisocial and
inappropriate behavior - dumping on the RAHE moderators on RAO - on to
others. As he rotinely has demonstrated, he refuses to accept
responsibility for this reprehensible, antisocial behavior, and
therefore, refuses to issue and apology for his actios as requested by
Dr. Bath.

It appears that Krueger, in his stupidity, thought that because he
could get away with trashing people on an unmoderated NG with no
consequences, he could also smear the moderators of RAHE with a similar
degree of immunity. Unfortunately for him, his own arrogance and
intellectually challenged behavior "convicted" him with negative
consequences as a result.