"Bruce J. Richman" wrote in message
oups.com...
:
: Ruud Broens wrote:
:
: "Bruce J. Richman" wrote in message : Keep on
: cutting and
: pasting out of context, Rudy, and we'll keep laughing at
: : your buumbling attempts to revise history.
: : We realize that cause and effect relationships involving Google
: ; posts don't exist.
: :
: : LOL !!!!
: :
: :
: :
: : Bruce J. Richman
:
: It's not really a laughing matter, anymore, Bruce. It's just pathetic.
:
: The only thing that is pathetic, Rudy, is that you've consistently
: ignroed the posts of people like Pinketon (in the past), Krueger and
: McKelvy have far exceeded and usually generated any negative comments
: I've made. You somehow have come to the rather perverted and bizarre
: conclusion that a person qualified to make descriptive statements about
: the abnormal onlne behavior of others should remain silent, while those
: very same abnormal people, about whom you say nothing by way of
: criticism should be allowed to use psychological terms inappropriately
: whenever they feel like it.

No, Bruce, I've come to the conclusion that you're not qualified to make *any*
descriptive statements. Don't push your luck, Brucie


IOW, you're trying to promote a doublke
: standard for posting on NGs - one for the people you support and admire
: and other for their targets.
:
:
: You've repeatedly ignored what i've presented as evidence of the
: 'quality and tone' of many of your postings.
:
: Wrong.

In your 'perverted logic' it is wrong to address behaviour as shown by X,
AS LONG AS one doesn't adress behaviour by Y ?? Who do you think you
are kidding, Mr. Brucy ???

: YOU have completely ignored the "quality and tone" of the flames
: gnerated by people like Krueger and McKelvy that have lead many of us
: to retaliate. I see no evidence that you are even remotely able to
: objectively evaluate what *really* happens on RAO and what individuals
: are responsible for most of it. Try reading, with an open mind, a
: thread entitled "Have You Had A Bad Krueger Experience" and see if you
: can continue to ignore the main source for the flame wars on RAO.
:
:
:
: There simply is no
: way out for you, you *did* post those exact lines, there simply
: *is no* defense - whether you want to claim it is out of context
: or not, you DID post those lines, repeatedly / in numerous variants.
:
: Game over.
:
: YOUR game of hypocritically blabla(..more ramblings following...)

I see you didn't take my advice to look up hypocritical ....bad mistake..

see you at the bottom of the abyss,

Rudy