Michael McKelvy lied again:

:


Bruce J. Richman" wrote in message
...
George M. Middius wrote:


Clyde Slick said:

Mr. Bath said he was banned for comments about the moderators.
I assume they were critical. Let's hope that the moderators
don't consider themselves immune to criticism.
Now, if it were for repeated fallacious and defamatory comments,
that is another story.
I don't know what Arny said, so I withhold my judgement.

Do you really think Krooger made a well-founded criticism? After all the
ridiculous accusations he's made against JA, Wheeler, Bamborough, etc.? It
was probably just a gratuitous personal slur, the kind we know all too
well on RAO.




I can tell you from personal experience on RAHE, that Krueger's attempts
to
smear those that don't agree with his views was carried over there.


McKelvy's attempts to change the subject by his usual misrepresentations of
what others have said, deleted

For those that doubt that the above statement is true, I'm sure they can find
plenty of examples of Krueger's confrontational and insulting posts on RAHE.
Nobody has to take my word for it, unless like Krueger and McKelvy, they think
Google is "lying to them".

It is also a fact that since I had some posts rejected by the moderators
because I fired back at Krueger's smears, I was told on several occasions by
the moderators, that compared to posts of mine that were submitted but sent
back to me for revision, some from Krueger were much worse than anything I
wrote.

McKelvy has a documented history of constantly trying to rationalize, justify,
and in general lie about Krueger's antisocial behavior on RAO. Therefore, it's
not at all surprising that he would try and misrepresent Krueger's posts on
RAHE as well.



Bruce J. Richman