On Fri, 14 Jan 2005 05:06:41 -0500, "Arny Krueger"
wrote:

"Schizoid Man" wrote in message


"Arny Krueger" wrote in message

No, Evolution will always be a theory. Observable changes over time
can be facts.

The irrelevant and wrong response:

The first electron microscopes appeared in the late 70s and early 80s
that enabled us to see atoms for the first time.

Bad science. Bad, bad science. The first Electon Microscope was built in the
1930s.

Bad, bad science there Arnold. The first Electron Microscope couldn't
"see atoms". So he is correct and you are wrong. I hope that Lionel
won't mind this little bit of pedantry to correct your *incorrect*
pedantry.

This is the first article that came up when I searched google on "first
electron microscope".

http://collections.ic.gc.ca/heirloom...e4/258-261.htm

"While there is little doubt that a German physicist developed the basic
principles of the electron microscope, both Canada and the United States
claim to be first in making it practical. The evidence, however, clearly
favours Canada as two postgraduate students working in the Physics
Department of the University of Toronto with their physics professor,
between 1937 and 1939, developed the first ever transmission electron
microscope."

You need to take a science class again, Arny.

If irony killed you'd have been dead years ago, Schizoid Boy.

The irony is on you - since you're supposed to know all about science.
Unfortunately, your English language comprehension skills let you down
yet again. If would be frustrating for you if you had the slightest
shred of self-awareness. Fortunately, you've built up a tidy defense.

Will we see an acknowlegement that you were wrong and an apology to
SM? I doubt it but time will tell.