"Bruce J. Richman" wrote in message
ups.com...

Michael McKelvy wrote:
"Bruce J. Richman" wrote in message
oups.com...

Michael McKelvy wrote:
"Bruce J. Richman" wrote in message
...
Lionel, the compulsive liar, and flaming fool wrote:


Bruce J. Richman a écrit :
Drake wrote:

87 flames to a test message. What a bunch of losers.


It shows you how desperate and compulsive some of RAO's flamers
are to
seek out any excuse to initiate a new smear campaign. Note who
started
flinging the smears first. That tells you a lot. Or is that
"LOT's".
Bruce J. Richman


99,99% of the time, BJ (lol) is at the origin of the flames...
This
"test" message is an other proof of his inevitable culpability.
(lol)



As usual, Lionel has no evidence,no facts, and no brains. Since
he
was
the
first person and Krueger the second to attack a thread containing
only one
word
"test", it's pretty clear that these chronic compulsive liars
will
flame
anything - even a one word post.

How exactly is responding to the single word "test" with the single
word
"congratulation" an attack? Tell the truth, you ran out of Xanax
again,
didn't
you?


Try facing reality, idiotic liar McKelvy, you can't be this stupid
can
you? Oh yes, even your addiction to marcotic painkillers and
indulgence in hallucinogencis don't seem to help.

If you think his single word response was an attack, plese explain
why.
For the record I'm addicted to niether marcotics or narcotics.


Really? "niether" ?

Remember your recent comments about Xanas and restraints? Explain for
the record how you have any knowledge that either of those words have
any relationship to me.


We'll all just chalk up your lack of awareness of sarcasm in Lionel's
response to your basic lack of understanding, and of course, your
readiness to always attack Krueger's many enemies.



Perhaps Lionel would like to list all the people he's attacked in
the
short
time he's been polluting RAO.

Pretty much everybody, as I said he's eqaul opportunity, but he did
give you
and I that glorious meeting of minds, where we agreed on something
for a
change.

We all know he hopes to match Krueger's record
of having a lost of enemies that he can attack,

How many people on the "lost"? How do you know that is his
intention?
Crystal Ball?


You compulsive liars and flamers all want to be No. 1. You've
already
proved to most of us that you're No. 2.

Middius posts more than I do and more than Arny. Finding things
where he's
not flaming somebody would be an easier thing to count.

but Krueger adds new ones all
the time, a feat that Lionel does not have the stamina to
duplicate, even
though this anti-semitic, Hamas Lover tries his best to be as
obnoxious
and
incoherent as possible.


At least he's not nearly as redundant as your esteemed self.

snicker

And you've once again neglected to condemn or even admit that you
lied
about Krueger not engaging in another unprovoked personal attack on
this very thread - as the 2nd attacker after your good friend and
soul
mate, Lionel.

This thread? He hasn't flamed anybody in this thread.
Do you mean some other thread?



That's a lie. Claiming that a person is "sucking at the baby bottle of
AOL" and claiming that "Richman probably doesn't even know what an ISP
is" (paraphrased quotes) are not attacks? They would be in the view of
any objective observer, which excludes you. Why do you think Krueger
even entered his comment right after Lionel?

Lionel, are we friends?
Bruce is there anything in the Google archive that would indicate
Lionel and
I are friends?

Thanks for once again proving how hypocritical you are, flamer.
LOL !!! LOL !!!!

Thanks for proving you don't know what the **** you're talking about,
again.

Thanks for once again demonstrating that you can';t tell the truth
about Krueger or the posts that you make, hypocrite.

Thanks for once again proving that you're an idiot with no idea of what
actually happens on RAO.

Thanks for once again confirming that you're full of ****, as most of
us have known for a long time.

Thanks for showing what a thin skinned **** you are.