Michael McKelvy wrote:
"Bruce J. Richman" wrote in message
ups.com...
Paul Dormer wrote:
"Michael McKelvy" emitted :
Fine, I'll do it your way, I'll search for just Richman. There
was
no
deliberate attempt to mislead, but you knew that.
The number of post where Arny is the author and the word Richman
is
found is
388. A staggering difference.
Now check again using "Rich man", "Richmand", "Reichman" and all
the
permutations Krueger has used to put goons like yourself off the
scent.
LOL !!! Well spoken. I'll buy off on that LOT's !!!! Thanks for
confirming that McKelvy has less brain power than an amoeba.
In addition, most of us know (excluding McKelvy) that word counts
in
and of themselves mean absolutely nothiung as to the intent or
content
in the author's post.
It would be much more informative, for example, to do a frequency
count
of the number of attack threads started by Krueger with either my
name
or that of other poster's in the title.
You still win.
Bull****. You're lying again.
And then of course, all remember the informal, yet very revealing
counting that Ed Shain did in which he listed all the difierent
people
that had been in fights with Krueger in the classic thread entitled
"Have You Had A Bad Krueger Experience". You, I and many others
are
among the many, many people on that list.
Yes, all the really nasty people made the list.
Bull****. All the people that Krueger has attacked made the list. And
iut continues to grow.
And that doesn't even
include more recent RAO posters that also would qualify for
inclusion.
Let's see if McKelvy wants to use his "eggspurt statistishun"
skills to
analyze that!!!! LOL !!!!
Where did I claim anything other than what I said the information
was.
In order to have attacked you, it stands to reason that your name
would be
included in the post. Very clearly he has not used your name as many
times
as you have used his. It seems reasonable to assume then, that you
have had
much more to say about him than he has about you. Since nearly
everything
you say about Arny is negative, it also stands to reason that you
have
attacked him far more than the other way round.
Your statistics prove nothing, as I and several other posters have
already shown. They are also misleading and not presented in a way
that accounts for how word counts are really derived.
|