"Michael McKelvy" wrote in message
ink.net
"Arny Krueger" wrote in message
...
wrote in message
ups.com

Arny Krueger wrote:


I bet you haven't knowingly heard Sear's work.

It's true that I listen to most music for enjoyment, not to
memorize the liner notes.

bet you didn't even know who he was before this thread.

I win that bet, Scott. But thanks for once again demonstrating your
ignorance and arrogance.

Here's proof:

http://groups-beta.google.com/group/...79389aa3e67aa9

A link that doesn't work is proof?


Worked for me. Here's what it said:

quotes from a post by me to another


For those of you that get-and it's free, you should-"Tape op"
magazine, Walter Sear has a good interview in the current issue. Make
no mistake: Tape Op caters largely to the lo-fi, DIY, Pro Tools
loving segment of the recording industry/hobby.

Note gratuitous slam of more modern technology than the retro-tech of
Walter Sears.. Admittedly Pro Tools is pretty retro-tech all by
itself, but compared to Walter Sear's digs, its as modern as today's
newspaper.

Nonetheless: Walter Sear has a nice tagline.
"The Recorded Sound Sucks-We're Trying to Make It Better"


If his web site is any indication of his thinking, his proposed
solution will be a return to the 70s and 80s.

Bottom line, I made detailed references to Walter Sears and his web site
back in July.

Therefore, Scott loses his bet that I didn't know who Walter Sears was
before today.

I suspect that Scott could access the Google web page, but is lying to
avoid admitting that he was wrong.