Arny Krueger wrote:


Bruce J. Richman" wrote in message

Arny Krueger offers another conspiracy theory:


"Bruce J. Richman" wrote in message


And of course, he neglects to mention the many posts that he has
submitted to RAHE which have attacked the statements of others
because of their preference for tubes, vinyl, or simply claiming
that they prefer the sound of one product to another. The RAHE
moderators will allow this to be posted as long as the statements
but not the person making them are the only things being attacked.
IOW, no personal attacks, as determined by the RAHE moderators.

Given that one of the RAHE moderators styles himself as proxy
defender of golden ears, it's getting harder and harder to get
posting of ideas he disagrees with even when they don't attack
people. On RAHE posts attacking me personally go through, but
attacks on certain cherished beliefs of one of the moderators get
cancelled.

Prove it!

You can find it all at this URL: www.google.com .

One can also find there concrete evidence of the personal attacks that Krueger
has made against me and many others on RAHE.




Krueger has offered no evidence to support his false claim that one
of the RAHE moderators supports subjective viewpoints and/or posters
only.

Since I didn't say that, this would be an irrelevant comment.


A false and deliberately misleading evaluation of what I have said. Krueger
said the following:

"one of the RAHE moderators styles himself as proxy
defender of golden ears, it's getting harder and harder to get
posting of ideas he disagrees with"

Obviously, Krueger has lied here. He has provided no evidence that any RAHE
moderator is a defender of "golden ears" - Krueger's frequent derisive term for
those that favor subjective evaluation and individual preferences.


While Krueger complains about posts attacking him personally being
allowed by RAHE moderators (or perhaps one of them), he predictably
fails to admit that personal attacks he has leveled against other
RAHE posters, including myself, have also been allowed on occasion by
the RAHE moderators.

Prove it with a specific example.

The evidence is readily accessible at www.google.com, and is a matter of public
record. You have failed to provide any proof that one of the moderators shows
favoritism towards posters with subjective opinions and or individual
preferences. If anything, the current content at RAHE could lead readers to
suppose the opposite is taking place - namely, a tendency to let in more
anti-subjective-opinion, anti-preference posts from double blind test zealots.
However, most rational individuals who don't share your paranoid conspiracy
theories, don't go around accusing RAHE moderators of favoritism. Only you do
that. LOL!


RAHE moderators, like the moderators of any Usenet NG, have a tough,
thankless job. Unfortunately, prejudiced zealots like Krueger, who
oppose any and all moderation, will always be the first to try and
smear them with false, unsubstantiated claims of unfair treatment.

Wrong Richman. I'm in favor of moderation that's fair. If there's a problem
with my post, let it be returned with a comment so I can correct it. But I
get back so many posts with no specific comments, there's really not a lot
that I can do.


That is a lie, Krueger. The Google record clearly shows that when discussions
about moderation have appeared on RAO, you have been the fist to libel, smear,
defame and lie about both those posts and the people posting them. One of your
favorite conspiracy theories most recently when this subject has been brought
up is that a group of moderators perhaps sharing some of my views would
deliberately censor your posts. Of course, nothing could be further from the
truth, paranoia-breath. I have neither the time nor inclination to be a
moderator for a version of RAO, moderated (i.e. RAM). My only purpose in
proposing it is to prevent proven compulsive liars and libelers like yourself
from engaging in personal attacks on the many others with whom you disagree.
Your real problems with RAHE have nothing to do with favoritism - they have to
do with your documented opposition to moderation.

As for your false claims abvout posts being returned to you without specific
comments - this is too is both revealing and deceptive at the same time.

You have said above:

"But I
get back so many posts with no specific comments, there's really not a lot
that I can do."

If you were not constantly trying to sneak personal attacks upon others through
on RAHE, you wouldn't get so many posts returned to you. Obviously, the
moderators don't have time to suggest the proper corrections that you need to
make.
Equally obvious is your long documented history of practically never admitting
that you have lied and/or libeled another person or deliberately misrepresented
what they have said through selective deletions when quoting them. The
moderators, since they have, by your own admission, returned "so many posts" to
you, that they logically and correctly know that you may know how to correct
them, but because of your agenda and hate-driven paranoia, usually won't do so.

While I don't expect either Dr. Bath or Dr. Dreyer to comment about these
matters on RAO, I would not be surprised to find out that you have had more
posts returned to you by the RAHE moderators because of personal attacks
against others than any other poster. And before you try and use the lame
excuse that you post more there than many others, let's consider this
hypothesis - It is highly probable that Krueger has had a greater PERCENTAGE of
his total posts returned to him by the RAHE moderators because of personal
attacks upon others than any other poster on RAHE.


Krueger has once again demonstrated, in this post, his
ever-increasing paranoid delusional system.

Given that Richman claimed facts not in evidence, we can safely consider
this another one of his delusional comments.


This of course is just another false claim by the compulsive liar and libeler,
Krueger. His use of the pronoun, "we" has not been shown to incluide more than
3 people of the total that post on RAO - (1) compulsive liar Krueger, (2) an
anonymous coward calling himself "torresists" who hopes to engratiate himself
with c-l-K by mimicing his libelous false claims, and (3) a braindead bigot
named McKelvy, whose role models are c-l-K and the late Senator Joe McCarthy.

The Goggle record clearly substantiates what I have said about Krueger: (1) his
documented opposition, defamation and lies about posters and posts dealing with
a moderated version of RAO, and (2) his personal attacks against both myself
and other posters on RAHE which have been allowed by the RAHE moderaors.



So now, not only is the
"Evil High End Establishment" and Stereophile conspiring against him,
but also the RAHE moderators as well.

The (s) would be another fabrication of Richman's delusional mind.


Another lie from the compulsive liar, Krueger. The Google record has recently
shown that Krueger has accused John Atkinson of Stereophile of possibly paying
people that post on RAO to post personal attacks against him. The Google
record also clearly shows that Krueger has frequently attacked equipment
manufacturers (especially those manufacturing analog equipment and tubed
electronics), audiophile equipment dealers, and of course, individuals that
might buy audiophile products.



What will be his next conspiracy theory?





remainder of Krueger's personal attacks deleted since they represent nothing
more than his usual attempt to spread disinformation and lies about others


Bruce J. Richman, Ph.D.
Licensed Psychologist