Michael McKelvy wrote:
"Paul Dormer" wrote in message
...
"Michael McKelvy" emitted :

Doofus, I agreed that if JJ said you were who you said you were
that was
good enough for me.

He once claimed to be unable to acquire the contact details of a
particular individual who was giving him some proper grief on RAO
and
behind the scenes, so I filled him in. JJ was not necessarily the
most
brilliant internet detective.. ;-)

My original proposal stands. Pick a time for me to call you,
then using
caller I.D. which I assume you have, post the last 4 numbers of
the
phone
I
call from. That's it.

What is to stop you from lying about the veracity of what Bruce
reports?? Nothing. This then gives you the green light to
continue to
harass him.. ad infinitum..?

Sounds like a trap...


A third party will know the numbers. There's no reason for me to
trap him,

Your 7 year harrassment campaign counts for nothing?


Since it doesn't exist, yes.

Denial of 7 year history of proven harassment noted. And this is
definitely ot an opinion, since numerous attack posts have been made by
McKelvy. It's just another of his lies.