"Bruce J. Richman" wrote in message
ups.com...

Michael McKelvy wrote:
"Paul Dormer" wrote in message
...
"Michael McKelvy" emitted :

Doofus, I agreed that if JJ said you were who you said you were
that was
good enough for me.

He once claimed to be unable to acquire the contact details of a
particular individual who was giving him some proper grief on RAO
and
behind the scenes, so I filled him in. JJ was not necessarily the
most
brilliant internet detective.. ;-)

My original proposal stands. Pick a time for me to call you, then
using
caller I.D. which I assume you have, post the last 4 numbers of the
phone
I
call from. That's it.

What is to stop you from lying about the veracity of what Bruce
reports?? Nothing. This then gives you the green light to continue
to
harass him.. ad infinitum..?

Sounds like a trap...


A third party will know the numbers. There's no reason for me to
trap him,
the number I'll call just has to be his publicly listed number.
Christ the
dip**** could call me anytime he wants a leave a message on my cell
if
wanted to, as long as it's from his publicly listed phone. I can
program
his name and number into my cell and I'll know if he called from it
unless
he blocks it.

If thd numbers are actually in the telephone book, as this imbecile
claims, I don't need any third party to hold the numbers.

Try and follow along. I'm not going to call you from either of my phones.

As Paul
Dormer correctly suggested, McKelvy has lied so many times about my
actions, that one more lie would be just standard operating procedure
for him.

Where excactly did he say that? He said I harrassed you, ignoring the fact
that you do far more of it than I do.

The tape, OTOH, which would actually contain very little
information, would be proof that he actually called as I reported it.
Further, the tape containing his message could be played back over his
own telephone upon arrangement.


If you call my home phone you could leave a message that could be played as
well.