McKelvy said:

More of that professional restraint. Speaking of restraints, are your
new ones comfortable?


BJR said:

Note the last sentence, in which once again, McKelvy atempts to
question my professional behavior, even though RAO has nothing to do
with my professional behavior. He has lied continuously about "not
mentioning my profession", while continuing to insinuate that a
psychologist has no right to strike back at brainless idiots like
Lionel, a known antiSemite, signature forger, and mindless babbler of
insults towards almost everybody on RAO.

No rational person would trust a liar like this that falsely states as
recently as today that he has not "brought up" my profession, while as
recently as last night, attacked it. His false claims that no proof
has been provided are further evidence of his lack of honesty.

If he wants this to end, he can accept my proposal and quit playing
games. I am not self-desttructive enough to use any tape recording I
have without another person's permission, so his lack of trust is a
strawman, and he knows it. If I post the tape on RAO, he can report me
to the appropriate licensing board and legal authorities. He's just
looking for a way to continue his attack strategies through use of a
phony proposal that is easy to sabotage.

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------


I do believe that McKelvy infringes with your freedom to be free of
headaches and with your enjoyment to express your views at Rao.