Lionel C. Middius wrote:
Bruce J. Richman a =E9crit :
George M. Middius wrote:

Sander deWaal said:


I believe there's actually a third, and more likely possibility;
Bruce Richman *is* a mental health professional, but on RAO, he's
just another contributor like all of us, with all his human pros

and

cons.

That's the sane person's appraisal.


Why should he be judged by any other standard than anyone else on

this

group?

Because he uses psychological jargon here.


I'm qualiried to use it...

I think that you are "qualiried" to take a paisible retirement far
from
Usenet agitation.

and know what the terms really mean. Krueger, McKelvy and Lionel
have
frequently called people delusional, insane, demented, senile, etc.
They have never given any evidence that they have any
qualifications
that even remotely suggest that they know what they are talking
about
when they use these terms.

I remember that you have spent your time in a long diatribe to
explain
me the specific mean of "insane".
How many time have you used the word "insane" on this RAO ?
Are you ready to certify that every time you have used it it was in a

pertinent way.
Do you understand that if we can find a relation between your above
statement : "I'm qualiried to use it" and an abusive use of the word
"insane" you can be qualified of *CHARLATAN* ?

Do you want I start the Google search ?

I'm sure you will continue to lie, butcher the language, and make
idiotic statements as you've always done. Your lies arew a ma matter
ofr Google record. Your delusional statements don't convince anybody
of anything other than trhe fact you're a pathological and quite
compulsive liar.