Sander deWaal wrote:
"Bruce J. Richman" said:
All that said, unlike McKelvy, I have not made false statements
about
his identity, job activities, or educational background except in an
obviously satirical manner, and even then, only after 7 years of
provocations on those subjects. As you might appreciate, I didn't
get
my training, degrees, and professional activities by sending in a
check
(cheque, money order) to some "paper mill" that delivers phony
credentials. Therefore, I don't, unlike cretins like Lionel and
McKelvy, attack the credentials of other people. Some things are
over
the line, at least for me, if not for MeKelvy, Krueger (who has
called
another poster a "pedophile", and Lionel, a known antiSemite and
purveyor of bigotry and other forms of ignorance-based babble).
I assume you want these things to stop then, after 7 years?
I think if ever the opportunity was there, it is now.
I see no evidence that McKelvy has any intention of stopping his
unprovoked personal attacks. As recently as yesterday, he jumped into
a thread inolving Lionel and I with idiotic comments about medications
and restraints. And then he gets selective amnesia and claims he
doesn't commenet on my professional behavior. As for Krueger and
Lionel, the Google record clearly indicates that they have no desier
tro cease making hostile comments. Krueger has been banned from RAHE
because of this type of behavior. AFAIK, Lionel ahs never posted there
or to any other moderated newsgroup that would force him to clean up
his act.
If it were up to me, RAO would, like some other NGs, have a certain
degree of self-moderation, and flame wars would not be in evidence.
However, that requires the cooperation of others. There is a Google
record of Krueger actually opposing attempts to make RAO a moderated
newsgroup, if you recall. Doug Haugen, myself, and several others
tried to do this at one time, and Krueger predictably opposed it,
claiming that the moderators would be "controlled" by a "clique"
opposed to his views. His reasons for opposing moderaton were obvious.
I know I'm being naive and idealistic and all that, but I'm quite
certain that Michael isn't happy with the current state of things as
well
Yes, it may take some effort, but you both can show that you can rise
above yourselves and your differences and make an end to it now.
That is, if BOTH of you are willing.
In your own interest, and that of Michael, I think it is high time
you
pull the plug on this. Really. And I don't think it is even necessary
to call eachother. You can settle this on RAO, or e-mail.
BTW I'm asking you now, but at the same time this is aimed at
Michael.
--
Sander de Waal
" SOA of a KT88? Sufficient. "
Sander, here's an example of the kind of libelous garbage that McKelvy
routinely posts:
Michael McKelvy Jan 9, 11:14 pm show options
Newsgroups: rec.audio.opinion
From: "Michael McKelvy" - Find messages by this
author
Date: Mon, 10 Jan 2005 07:14:17 GMT
Local: Sun, Jan 9 2005 11:14 pm
Subject: Test of Newsreader
Reply | Reply to Author | Forward | Print | Individual Message | Show
original | Report Abuse
"Bruce J. Richman" wrote in message
oups.com...
Lionel wrote:
- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
Bruce J. Richman a =E9crit :
More bull**** that practically nobody believes except you. Your
[repetititon]
of [tyhe] same lies over and over again is clear evidence that you
[contuinue] to
deny reality.
Seems that Bruce is close to the end...
I don't understand why his nurse still autorises him to ramble on
Usenet. ;-)
Bruce J. Richman
Parapsychologist
Lionel's obvious idiocy is more predictable than anything else on RAO.
The voices in his head are once again telling him to make a fool of
himself - not that he needs any encouragement to do that
..
It's kind of startling how all of the people who don't seem to like all
seem
to be crazy.
His lobotomy
just increased his already considerable level of stupidity and
meaningless babble
..
Hmmm, and yours comes from where or should I say what?
I guess the French mental institutions are not too
effective in treating village idiots. They should consider euthanasia
as a favor to his fanily
..
More of that professional restraint. Speaking of restraints, are your
new
ones comfortable?
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Note the last sentence, in which once again, McKelvy atempts to
question my professional behavior, even though RAO has nothing to do
with my professional behavior. He has lied continuously about "not
mentioning my profession", while continuing to insinuate that a
psychologist has no right to strike back at brainless idiots like
Lionel, a known antiSemite, signature forger, and mindless babbler of
insults towards almost everybody on RAO.
No rational person would trust a liar like this that falsely states as
recently as today that he has not "brought up" my profession, while as
recently as last night, attacked it. His false claims that no proof
has been provided are further evidence of his lack of honesty.
If he wants this to end, he can accept my proposal and quit playing
games. I am not self-desttructive enough to use any tape recording I
have without another person's permission, so his lack of trust is a
strawman, and he knows it. If I post the tape on RAO, he can report me
to the appropriate licensing board and legal authorities. He's just
looking for a way to continue his attack strategies through use of a
phony proposal that is easy to sabotage.
|