Sander deWaal wrote:
Lionel said:

There are 2 possible theories about Richman, to answer to the
question : how
a registered licensed psychologist can have such aberrant attitude
on a
public forum :

1- McKelvy's one which is un-surprisedly wrong : Richman is not a
psychologist.

2- Richman is a psychologist but he is insane (senile) and doesn't
have
anymore patients.

I believe there's actually a third, and more likely possibility;
Bruce Richman *is* a mental health professional, but on RAO, he's
just another contributor like all of us, with all his human pros and
cons.

Why should he be judged by any other standard than anyone else on
this
group?
The fact that he was pressed to mention his profession, his titles
and
his practicing license, has much to do with the allogations about him
*not* being what he said he is.

--
Sander de Waal
" SOA of a KT88? Sufficient. "

Only the third possibility is even remotely possible and has proven to
be true. Flamethrowers like Lionel,Krueger and McKelvy aer really
scared to death of anybody qualified to objdectively and professionally
evaluate their online behavior. Consequently, they try and discredit
through a series of lies and libelous false statements opinions about
their online behavior given by somebody such as myself that can use
words like "delusional" wuith some meaning behind it, and not just as a
pathetic attempt to engage in psychobabble or amateur personality
assessment.

Any objective observer only has to examine the content of the posts of
Lionel, Krueger & McKelvy to quickly see that their main objdective on
RAO ha always been to attack and any and all who don't endorse their
tunnel-visioned views of others. In the case of Lionel, there is no
effort to discuss audio topics, because that would take away from his
goal of inheriting Krueger's "most hated poster" title at some time in
time in the future.