"Joseph Oberlander" wrote in message
news


Michael McKelvy wrote:
"Fella" wrote in message
...

Michael McKelvy wrote:


Next listen to it and focus on how you hear it,

Since you have the duh!monopoly on the duh!knowledge concerning what's
"audible" for humans, it should be a given that everyone would hear the
recordings as SAME!


If I thought that were true I wouldn't have suggested critical listening
in the first place. I am interested in finding out what differences
people hear, and what differences might be heard in LP vs. CD recordings
of the same material.

Dude - is this 2005 or 1985? Seriously. This has been done and re-done
to the point of ubsurdity. CD is better in all aspects, just like it
is compared to tape, so get over it.

You're preaching to the choir. I just wanted to see what, if any
differences the LP listeners might be hearing. Since they seem to wax
poetic about such a technically inferior format, I wondered what the deal
was.